State v. Brassfield

Appellant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny. This appeal is from the judgment. This is the second time this ease has been before this court, the decision in the former ease being reported at 33 Ida. 660,' 197 Pac. 559, where a statement of the material facts in the case will be found. We will proceed to take up and dispose of the errors relied upon for a reversal in the order in which they are stated in appellant’s brief.

The first error assigned involves the action of the trial court in permitting the prosecuting attorney to read to the jury the testimony of one, Steenson, given…