Legal Opinion
State v. Stuth
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1895No. 1665PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
The appellant was convicted, under § 95 of the Penal Code, of disturbing a religious society. The information, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:
“Comes now Milo A. Root, county and prosecuting attorney for Thurston county, 'Washington, and the court being in session and the grand jury not being in session, and gives the court to understand and be informed that Otto Stuth is guilty of the offense of disturbing a religious society, and the members thereof when met together for public worship, committed as follows, to-wit:
“ He, the said…
2Cited by18 opinions
- In re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. McKinleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. OmaechevviariaIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Loveland v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.