Legal Opinion
Reiman v. International Hospitality Group
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 4, 1989No. 87-105PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant Richard Reiman contends the trial judge erred in failing to apply the prevention doctrine to excuse the closing of a real estate transaction as a condition precedent to appellee International Hospitality Group’s (IHG) 1 promise to pay him brokerage commissions. He appeals from the denial of his motion under Super.Ct. Civ.R. 59(e) for reconsideration of the dismissal under Super Ct.Civ.R. 41(b) of his breach of contract claim against IHG for a brokerage commission of $200,000 plus interest in connection with the sale and purchase of the Connecticut Inn Motel. He…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Order of Ahepa v. Travel Consultants, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bay General Industries, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mendoza v. Comsat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Reiman v. International Hospitality Group, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Peck v. Selex Systems Integration, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Simple Global, Inc. v. BanasikCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021