Legal Opinion
State v. Betances
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 26, 2003No. SC 16907PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The defendant, Vincent Betances, appeals1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of a narcotic substance, heroin, with intent to sell in violation of General Stat*495utes § 2 la-277 (a)2 and possession of a narcotic substance, heroin, within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (d).3 The defendant claims that the trial court: (1) improperly denied his motion to suppress eight bags of heroin found on his person in violation of his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination under Miranda v. Arizona, 384…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. George J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.