Legal Opinion
Fowler-Barham Ford, Inc. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 18, 1980No. 7911SC533PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs present three questions for our determination on this appeal. We find no error in the trial for the reasons that follow.
Question No, 1
“1. Did the trial court err in denying plaintiffs’ motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of defendants’ evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence, in submitting issue four to the jury and in denying plaintiffs’ post-trial motions, in view of the evidence of the defendants, which taken in the light most favorable to each of them, failed to reveal that any of the plaintiffs increased the hazard insured against by any means…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rose v. Epley Motor SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Beanblossom v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Stone v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Stone v. . Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- DURHAM BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. PollardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Seaside Resorts, Inc. v. Club Car, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Pacheco v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Freeman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Hinnant v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Bruegge v. Mastertemp, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.