Legal Opinion

Estate of Muller

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1969No. Civ. 26394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Appellant, the petitioner in two petitions in which he attacked the appointment of and sought the removal of respondent as the administrator of his mother’s estate and the issuance of letters of administration to himself, has appealed from a “Judgment On Verdict” which was entered upon a directed verdict of a jury denying him the relief sought in his petitions. The “judgment” is appealable as an order refusing to remove a representative. (Prob. Code., § 1240; Estate of Cuneo (1963) 214 Cal. App.2d 381, 383-384 [29 Cal.Rptr. 497].)

The ultimate issue of whether the court erred in…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'HAGEN v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Turner v. EversAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1973
  3. Turner v. EversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Bambrick v. OdekerkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API