Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Chisholm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to District Court of Chaffee County. Action to determine adverse mining claim, brought by Edwin E. Thomas, Cyrus W. Pusher and John Taylor against Robert .Chisholm, Mary J. Riggins, H. E. Chapman and John P. Hudgent. Verdict and judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

The parties to this action occupied the same positions as plaintiffs and defendants in the court below as in this court. Defendants having applied for a patent to a certain mining claim, known as the “Tecumseh Lode,” plaintiffs filed their adverse claim thereto, and commenced this action, claiming the same premises under the name of the “Starlight Lode.” The defendants based their title upon a prior location made by one Joseph Hudson and the Kansas City Mining & Smelting Company. The testimony tended to show that said smelting company ivas a corporation organized under the laws of the state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'REILLY v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McGinnis v. EgbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. Doon v. TeshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Becker v. PughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. Manning v. StrehlowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McFeters v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Donahue v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Burke v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bowen v. Sil-Flo CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Keeler v. TruemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API