Legal Opinion

Corbell v. Stengel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1935No. 9559PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This action was brought by C. W. Cor-bell against George Stengel for damages for an alleged fraud perpetrated upon the former by the latter. In response to a directed jury verdict, judgment was rendered denying recovery to Corbell, who has appealed. The parties will be designated as plaintiff and defendant, respectively, as in the court below.

In brief, plaintiff alleged that defendant was cashier of a Menard bank, with which plaintiff transacted all his business; that he kept his notes and other business papers in the bank and transacted his banking and other business affairs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osburn v. SmartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Miller v. Shelby County Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Holbert v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Western National Bank v. Rives, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  4. Murff v. DreebenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Brown v. WesterfeldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API