Hunt's Pier Associates v. Conklin (In Re Hunt's Pier Associates)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The issue presented for determination in the instant proceeding is whether an individual who resides in Ontario, Canada has been properly served when a process server left papers for him with “a [sic] adult female secretary at his place of business.” Since we find that such service is insufficient under both the law of this jurisdiction (Pennsylvania) and that of Ontario, we conclude that service on the Canadian Defendant was improper under the controlling international Hague Convention principles, as well as any other arguably…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dimensional Communications, Inc. v. Oz Optics Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- In Re SchwenkeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Schwinn Plan Committee v. AFS Cycle & Co. (In Re Schwinn Bicycle Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Eplus Technology, Inc. v. AboudDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- O'Halloran v. Milehouse Investment Management Ltd. (In Re Greater Ministries International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.