Legal Opinion

Eplus Technology, Inc. v. Aboud

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 10, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-699-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

This common-law fraud and RICO 1 action against Canadian defendants presents questions of personal jurisdiction and sufficiency of service under Rule 4(f), Fed. R.Civ.P., and the Hague Convention. Also presented is the question of whether the complaint states a valid RICO claim.

I

Plaintiff ePlus Technology, Inc. is a Virginia corporation doing business as a supplier of computer equipment. Defendants Patricia Aboud, George Bernaehawy, and Jean-Marie Chartouni are Canadian citizens and residents of Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Defendant Daniel Ackerib is a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Syncrude Canada Ltd. v. Highland Consulting Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. Brown-Thomas v. HynieDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
  3. Atwater v. Light Korean Presbyterian Church (In Re Mak Petroleum, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  4. Convergen Energy LLC v. BrooksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Reintegrative Therapy Association, Inc. v. KinitzDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API