Legal Opinion
In Re Schwenke
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 2004No. 20011025PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:
¶ 1 Petitioner A. Paul Schwenke was disbarred in 1993 for professional misconduct. Schwenke appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for readmission to the Utah State Bar (“Bar”), arguing that the district court and the Bar misapplied the Rules of Lawyer Discipline and Disability and the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar in considering his petition. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 In 1993, Schwenke was disbarred for the misappropriation of funds in connection with his representation of a client. He was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $97,250…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- O.J. Distributing, Inc., A/K/A Great State Beverage v. Hornell Brewing Company, Inc., D/B/A Ferolito, Vultaggio & Sons, A/K/A Arizona BeveragesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Ruckenbrod v. MullinsUtah Supreme Court · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- MONTANA PROFESSIONAL SPORTS, LLC. v. National Indoor Football League, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Injured Workers Ass'n v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- In re K.A.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
- Pugh v. Draper CityUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re FoxUtah Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.