Legal Opinion

Young v. Estate of Snell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1997No. 64165-0PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

The Estate of Rex Lee Snell obtained review of an order of the Pierce County Superior Court denying its motion for a summary judgment dismissing William and Karolyn Young’s (Young) lawsuit against it for personal injuries. In this review we are called upon to determine what time limitation, if any, applies to a lawsuit for personal injuries that is maintained against the estate of an alleged tort-feasor who was insured at the time of the injury, but died prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations that would have applied to a suit against the deceased had he lived. We conclude that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Timberline Air Service, Inc. v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Barstad v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Barstad v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McGee Guest Home, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API