Legal Opinion

Barstad v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2002No. 70268-3PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

Presented here is a class of insured individuals who claim that title insurance companies should have made certain disclosures to them in preliminary commitments for title insurance. Specifically, these insureds claim that the companies should have disclosed that the parcels of land securing the loans had not been divided from larger tracts, that a senior lien existed on two of the lots, and that loan proceeds were being used to satisfy the senior lien. The title insurance companies contend that they had no such disclosure obligations. We agree with the title companies and hold that title…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Michak v. Transnation Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Michak v. Transnation Title Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Loeffelholz v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Parentage of JMKWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Brock v. KeplWashington Supreme Court · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API