Legal Opinion
City of Red Wing v. Eichinger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 24, 1925No. 24,094PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
The city of Red Wing carried workmen’s compensation insurance with the Travelers Insurance Company. The city employed Ole Haga as a street sweeper. The city and Haga were each subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act. While Haga was engaged in his work he was injured by a collision between two automobiles operated oni the street by defendants. The Industrial Commission made an award to the employe. The insurance company paid it.
The city now sues the defendants and lays negligence at their door and seeks to recover the amount so received by the employe. The court dismissed the action and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State ex rel. Thompson v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Travelers Insurance v. Village of WadsworthOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Carlson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Universal Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Reed CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Blair v. EspelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Coleman v. Hamilton Storage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.