Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Olmedo

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 31, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action in December 1972 to recover for injury to the eye of Dolores Wagner [plaintiff] which occurred during the healing period following an operation performed by defendant Livio Olmedo [Dr. Olmedo] to correct a facial neuralgia known as tic douloureux. As originally cast, the complaint alleged that the eye was improperly bandaged so that it rubbed against the bandage, and alleged breach of certain implied warranties concerning the manner of performing the operation. Plaintiff now seeks to amend the complaint to add as a ground for recovery that Dr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  2. State v. WoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. Christian v. Wilmington General Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  4. Zagurski v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  5. Applied Data Processing, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Oakes Ex Rel. Oakes v. GildaySuperior Court of Delaware · 1976
  3. Bigay v. GarveyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API