Legal Opinion

Bigay v. Garvey

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1997No. C9-96-1033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

A surgical patient who suffered a perforated ileum and sigmoid colon during a spinal fusion operation challenges evidentiary rulings and an adverse jury verdict. We find no reversible error in the evidentiary rulings and affirm the jury verdict. We also affirm the district court’s entry of a directed verdict dismissing the patient’s negligent supervision claim against the hospital. We reverse, however, the district court’s pretrial order disallowing, as time-barred, an amended claim for negligent treatment.

FACTS

Shari Bigay first met with Dr. Timothy Garvey at the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bigay v. GarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Shea v. EsenstenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API