Legal Opinion

Lloyd-Garretson Co. v. Marvin & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

1-3. Defendant by assigning its claim for $100 to Willamette Fruit & Produce Co. for the purpose of recovering same from plaintiff in the instant case rescinded the contract for the purchase of the peaches. Bringing the action for the return of the money so paid was a rescission of the contract to purchase. In the Willainette Fruit & Produce Co. case Lloyd-G-arretson Co., plaintiff herein, attempted to collect from said Willamette Fruit & Produce Co. the price for the entire carload of peaches. Said Lloyd-Garretson Co. as defendant in that case counterclaimed for that amount. As a matter of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. La Follett v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hirschfeld v. McCullaghOregon Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Schramm v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. J. L. Latture Equipment Co. v. Gruendler Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Willamette Title Co. v. NorthernOregon Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API