Legal Opinion

J. L. Latture Equipment Co. v. Gruendler Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an action at'law tried by the court without a jury. Findings of fact were made and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff for a part of the amounts claimed by plaintiff; both parties appealed.

Plaintiff is an Oregon corporation. The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri. Its principal office is at the city of St. Louis.

As alleged and as it appears in the record, plaintiff purchased from defendant on trial on April 13, 1927, at Portland, Oregon, one No. 6X steel frame Gruendler monster crusher with trap iron catcher at the agreed price of $4,063 f.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McFarlane v. McFarlaneOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Mercer v. Germania Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. American Oil Pump & Tank Co. v. FoustOregon Supreme Court · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartow v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Robert L. Spoo v. Ferris F. BootheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. Bartow v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc. v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API