Legal Opinion

McCollum v. Singer Company

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 6, 1989No. 1410PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a workers’ compensation case. The Hearing Commissioner found the claimant, Charles Douglas McCollum, sustained a 35 percent impairment to his back, a 20 percent impairment to his stomach and a 15 percent impairment to his leg. The Full Commission reversed, finding the claimant totally disabled. Singer Company, employer, appealed to the Circuit Court which affirmed the Full Commission. We affirm the Circuit Court decision.

ISSUES

I. Does the record provide substantial evidence to support a finding that the claimant is totally disabled and unemployable?

II. Did the Circuit Court abuse its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Colvin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Coleman v. Quality Concrete Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Lyles v. Quantum Chemical Co. (Emery)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Simmons v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Stephenson v. Rice Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Watson v. Xtra Mile Driver Training, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API