Watson v. Xtra Mile Driver Training, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGeathers, J.
Respectfully, I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur with the majority’s holdings that: (1) Watson’s strength assessment was properly admitted into evidence, and (2) the employer is entitled to a credit for payment of temporary disability benefits made after Watson reached maximum medical improvement. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s holding that Watson is not permanently and totally disabled, pursuant to sections 42-9-10 and 42-9-30(21) of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2011).
In South Carolina, there are two models of workers’ compensation; the first, an economic…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wynn v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Fields v. Owens Corning FiberglasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Stephenson v. Rice Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Simmons v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- McCollum v. Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989