Legal Opinion

Petroscience Corporation v. Diamond Geophysical, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1984No. C-2723PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit on a note with a usury counterclaim. Diamond Geophysical sued Petroscience Corporation and two individual guarantors of the note. The note provided for interest at the rate of nineteen 1 percent until maturity, but was silent about interest after maturity. On default of installment payments, Diamond Geophysical accelerated the note and brought suit. Diamond Geophysical’s original petition asked for interest at the rate of nineteen percent after maturity. It subsequently superseded that pleading with an amended petition asking in the alternative for interest at the maximum legal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Linz v. Eastland CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Wall v. East Texas Teachers Credit UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hopkins v. CrittendenTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Roberts v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Henry H. BlantonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. AU Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Boston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ginsberg 1985 Real Estate Partnership v. Cadle Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Bailey, Vaught, Robertson and Co. v. Remington Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API