Legal Opinion

AU Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Boston

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided January 29, 1999No. 06-98-00032-CVPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice ROSS.

AU Pharmaceutical, Inc. (AU) appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of Betty Boston, Floyd Boston, Helen Fowler, L.E. Fowler, Gary Hawley, Barbara Jones, Wayland Jones “as representative of the Estate of H. Weimar Jones,” Edith Keller, Helen McGehee, Slayton MeGehee, Ame-lie Moffett, Milam Roberts, and Doris Snow (collectively referred to herein as Boston) for breach of a written settlement agreement between the parties. The trial court ultimately awarded damages of $140,000.00, prejudgment interest of $5,615.34 (at a rate of six percent),…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  3. Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Z.A.O., Inc. v. Yarbrough Drive Center Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2001
  5. Flagship Hotel, Ltd. v. City of Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API