Legal Opinion

Bailey, Vaught, Robertson and Co. v. Remington Investments, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 27, 1994No. 05-93-00911-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OVARD, Justice.

Bailey, Vaught, Robinson and Company (BVR) appeals a judgment in favor of Remington Investments, Inc. (Remington) in this suit on a promissory note. In three points of error, BVR contends the trial court erred in (1) holding that Remington was a holder in due course, (2) granting Remington’s motion for summary judgment and ordering that BVR take nothing on its counterclaims, and (3) denying BVR’s motion for continuance. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

1. Background Facts and Procedural History

On January 11, 1989, William Bailey and William Vaught,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. World Help v. Leisure Lifestyles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Fein v. R.P.H., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. AU Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Boston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  4. FFP Marketing Co. v. Long Lane Master Trust IVCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Watson v. Dallas Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API