American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Elder
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. While it is true that in determining whether a suit contains a separable controversy wholly between citizens of different States, so as to be removable to the United States court (U. S. Code Ann., §§ 41, 71, title 28, the court may disregard a merely nominal or proper party (Ex parte State of Nebraska, 209 U. S. 436, 28 Sup. Ct. 581, 52 L. ed. 876; Davidson v. Montana-Dakota Power Co., 22 Fed. 2d, 688), and the court may also look beyond the formal alignment of the parties as they appear on the face of the pleading, and rearrange them according to their actual interests…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Ayres v. WiswallSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Parnell v. WootenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Volunteer State Life Insurance v. Powell-White Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Cather v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., Ltd., of London, EnglandDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1950