Legal Opinion
Cather v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., Ltd., of London, England
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided November 15, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 32-50PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
The defendant moves that this action be dismissed because, (a) the complaint fails to state a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted, and (b) the amended complaint fails to include parties indispensable to tire determination of the claim reflected in it.
The former of the two grounds has not been supported by argument or briefs; and it is manifestly untenable. The latter ground has been submitted to the court on oral arguments and briefs and is now considered. It will be understood more clearly if the history of this action is recalled.
Tn his…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Russell v. Clark's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Keegan v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- De Wit v. Firstar Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Oscar L. Green, Robert A. Green, Quentin L. Green and Alice Green v. Herschel S. Green and Madge GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953