Legal Opinion

Presley v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1999No. 92,675PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 KAUGER, J.:

¶ 2 It is uncontested that failure to give raises to all county officers under 19 O.S. Supp.1998 § 180.74 will result in differing pay scales for mid-term elected officials and those officers beginning terms after the statute’s effective date of November 1, 1998. 1 The issue presented by the declaratory judgment action 2 is whether equal protection guarantees 3 are denied by the Okla. Const. art. 23, § 10 4 and 19 O.S. Supp.1993 § 180.77 5 prohibiting mid-term election salary increases for public officials. We hold that the constitutional and statutory provisions do not violate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API