Presley v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 KAUGER, J.:
¶ 2 It is uncontested that failure to give raises to all county officers under 19 O.S. Supp.1998 § 180.74 will result in differing pay scales for mid-term elected officials and those officers beginning terms after the statute’s effective date of November 1, 1998. 1 The issue presented by the declaratory judgment action 2 is whether equal protection guarantees 3 are denied by the Okla. Const. art. 23, § 10 4 and 19 O.S. Supp.1993 § 180.77 5 prohibiting mid-term election salary increases for public officials. We hold that the constitutional and statutory provisions do not violate…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.