Legal Opinion
United States v. Mountain Metal Co.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided April 5, 2001No. Civ.A. 98-C-2562-S, 98-C-2886-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CLEMON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, the United States of America, Exide Corporation and Johnson Controls, Inc., bring civil actions against defendants pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). 42 U.S.C. § 9607. et. seq. Only three defendants remain in this action: 1) Lion Metals, Inc., 2) Made-well & Madewell, Inc., and 3) G.J. Battery Inc., d/b/a Jowers Battery, Inc. (Trial Tr. at p. 250.) The United States of America brought its civil action against Madewell and Jowers for recovery of past and future…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Martin v. HadixSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Catellus Development Corporation v. United States of America, Defendant-Amicus, General Automotive, Inc., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Chatham Steel Corp. v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Interstate Non-Ferrous Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Gould, Inc. v. A&M Battery & Tire ServiceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001