Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hadix

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 21, 1999No. 98-262PublishedCited by 326 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*347Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the Court.*

Section 803(d)(3) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA or Act), 110 Stat. 1321-72, 42 U. S. C. § 1997e(d)(3) (1994 ed., Supp. III),† places limits on the fees that may be awarded to attorneys who litigate prisoner lawsuits. We are asked to decide how this section applies to cases that were pending when the PLRA became effective on April 26, 1996. We conclude that § 803(d)(3) limits attorney’s fees with respect to postjudgment monitoring services performed after the PLRA’s effective date but it does not so limit fees for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Everett Hadix v. Perry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by326 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Barbara Combs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

321 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API