Legal Opinion

Gould, Inc. v. A&M Battery & Tire Service

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2001No. 3:91-cv-01714Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CONABOY, District Judge.

I

This matter has a long history in this Court and evolves from lead contamination in the area of the Marjol Battery Company, resulting from the crushing and recycling of batteries at its former site in the Borough of Throop, Pennsylvania.

This action was brought to require contribution from Alexandria Scrap Corporation, Lake Erie Recycling Company, R & R Salvage Company and American Scrap Co. which sold batteries to Marjol.

The remaining Defendants in this action were contributors of batteries to the site who appealed this Court’s original decision.

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Orsatti v. New Jersey State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API