Marsh v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action brought to quiet title, and for an injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with plaintiff’s possession of the property in question, and the defendant Carrie F. Holder Smith from conveying or encumbrancing the title thereto, with a further prayer “that it be adjudged and decreed that if said defendant Carrie F. Holder Smith has any title in said property, the said title is that of a trust only for the benefit of said plaintiff,” as well as for general relief.
The defendants appeared separately. For our present purposes it will suffice to say that each of them,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- James v. Oakland Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Norris v. LillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Herman v. HaffeneggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kinert v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Jordan v. WarnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Teixeira v. VerissimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Costa v. NevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. AhernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.