Legal Opinion

Lanehart v. Devine

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 19, 1985No. Civ. Y-83-3545PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

This case is an action by employees of the federal government for damages for a declaratory judgment against their employer, the United States of America. Plaintiffs are federal employees engaged in firefighting activities at various military and airport installations across the country. They contend that in computing the rates of pay to which they are entitled for time spent (1) on jury duty or witness service under 5 U.S.C. § 6322, (2) performing services in the reserves of the armed forces or the National Guard under 5 U.S.C. § 6323, (3) on annual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lanehart v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. The Gms Group, LLC and Joseph Costa v. Nathan BendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Armitage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Piechowicz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1988
  5. Mark Acton and 579 Other Named v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API