Legal Opinion

In re Claim of Wright

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1976No. Appeal, No. 1488 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

James Wright (claimant) appeals to this Court from an adjudication of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. (Board) denying to him unemployment compensation benefits because of its determination that he was in violation of the availability-for-work provisions found in Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §801 (d).1

As applied to claimant, Section 401(d) prohibits him from so restricting his future availability for potential work as to render himself not realistically…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of Commonwealth v. HartCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Myers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Edelman v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. of REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Graham v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Patronas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Davis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Rodgers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Reardon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Tokar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Stockdill v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API