Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1362 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

We are required in this case once again to draw that very fine line between those who are ineligible for benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law1 because they are primarily students who also work and those who are eligible for benefits because they are workers who also go to school. The instant claimant, Paul R. Reardon, Jr., asks ns to place him in the latter category.

In March 1973, when he was 19 years old, claimant began working full time for General Electric in Reading. Within a few months he secured a position as bench hand, a position he retained for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wiley Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Graham v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Patronas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Woodley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. In re Claim of WrightCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lipchak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Davenport v. STATE, DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENTIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Breen v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Ettorre v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Sickafuse v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API