Legal Opinion

United States v. Meadow

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 30, 1982No. CM 442145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKAY, Judge:

This case is before the Court for mandatory review pursuant to Article 66, Uniform *1004Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (1976) (hereinafter UCMJ). The appellant, Second Lieutenant Meadow, pleaded guilty to the lesser included offense of wrongful appropriation, but was convicted of larceny of various items of diving equipment and blasting fuse ignitors of a value of $1196.33, the property of the United States Government. The convening authority approved the findings and the adjudged sentence of dismissal from the service. The appellant contends there were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The People v. HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. ReapU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API