Legal Opinion
In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 3, 1979No. MDL 342, No. 76 C 3830PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
473 F.Supp. 382 (1979)
In re URANIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
v.
RIO ALGOM LIMITED, Rio Algom Corporation, Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation Limited, RTZ Services Limited, Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation, Conzinc Rio Tinto of Australia Limited, Mary Kathleen Uranium Limited, Pancontinental Mining Limited, Queensland Mines Limited, Nuclear Fuels Corporation, Anglo-American Corporation of South Africa, Limited, Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, Denison Mines, Limited, Denison Mines (U.S.) Incorporated, Noranda Mines Limited, Gulf Oil Corporation, Gulf…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- George Harper and Robert Padilla v. Lieutenant AlbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. KueiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Kenney v. RustMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.