Legal Opinion
B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 12, 1994No. 93 C 20149PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REINHARD, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff B. Sanfield, Inc. (“B. Sanfield”) filed a three-count amended complaint against defendant Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation (“Finlay”), alleging violations of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“CFDBPA”), 815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. Previously, this court dismissed the original complaint for failure to plead allegations of fraud with the particularity required by Fed. R.Civ.P. 9(b), granting B. Sanfield leave to file an amended…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- American Broadcasting Co. v. Maljack Productions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Brom v. Bozell, Jacobs, Kenyon & Eckhardt, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Smart Inventions, Inc. v. Allied Communications Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
- B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.