Legal Opinion

Danley v. Cooper

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1963No. 36430PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is a rear-end collision case. The negligence of the defendants, 1 whose panel truck ran into the rear of the plaintiffs’ 2 car, is conceded. The trial court held that on the agreed facts the plaintiff was, as a matter of law, contributorily negligent; and that, as a matter of law, the last clear chance doctrine did not apply, and entered a summary judgment of dismissal.

From this judgment, the plaintiff appeals, urging that the issues of her negligence, of proximate cause, and of last clear chance presented questions of fact for a jury.

The case comes before us on an agreed statement of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. LundquistWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McCoy v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Guerin v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mazur v. GranthamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Publishers Forest Products Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Cramer v. Van ParysCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Ashley v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ashley v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API