Legal Opinion

Mazur v. Grantham

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 14, 1964No. 51106PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is a rear-end collision case. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, filed separate actions. The actions were joined for trial and so presented here. Plaintiff-husband was the driver and owner of the car involved. Defendants are son-driver and father-owner of the other car involved.

Tbe trial court sustained defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding* the verdict, and in the alternative granted a new trial if we held the first ruling to be erroneous, in the case of plaintiff-husband; in the wife’s ease a remittitur of all the $14,500 verdict in excess of $6000 under pain of a new trial.

I.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Acuff v. SchmitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ferris v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Ruud v. GrimmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Hamdorf v. CorrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Northrup v. Miles Homes, Inc. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Giltner v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Robeson v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Miller v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API