Legal Opinion
In Re Bextra & Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices & Product Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 5, 2007No. 05-1699 CRBPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PURCHASE CLAIMS IN SECOND AMENDED MASTER CELEBREX AMD BEX-TRA COMPLAINTS FOR LACK OF STANDING AND RES JUDICA-TA
BREYER, District Judge.
These putative class action lawsuits arise out of the marketing and sale of the prescription drugs Celebrex and Bextra. Now pending before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss on the grounds of standing, res judicata, and failure to state a claim. This Memorandum and Order will address the standing and res judi-cata issues; the Court will issue a separate Memorandum and Order addressing the remaining issues. As…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sheth v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pennsylvania Employee, Benefit Trust Fund v. Zeneca, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In Re Actiq Sales and Marketing Practices Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 20 Welfare & Benefit Fund v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016
- American Federation of State v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.