Legal Opinion
In re: Edward Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 25, 2016No. 16-12065-J; 16-12649PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Edward Thomas has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- In Re: Wissam HammoudCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- In re: Marvin GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Derwin FrittsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.