Legal Opinion

In Re: Wissam Hammoud

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 23, 2019No. 19-12458-GPublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE PANEL:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 (h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Wissam T. Hammoud has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving one of the following two circumstances:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Michael Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Carlos Granda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Antonyo ReeceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Miguel Alvarado-Linares v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  5. In Re: Neil NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API