Legal Opinion

People v. Gritchen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 28, 1995No. 95SA327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding has entered into a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. Pursuant to a plea bargain, the respondent received a deferred judgment and sentence for soliciting for prostitution and soliciting for child prostitution. The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in a range from eighteen months to two years. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. GrenemyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. People v. MadsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. People v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. DawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. BertagnolliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. DamkarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. EspeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API