Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 1995No. 94SA410PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The lawyer respondent in this discipline case was convicted of the third-degree sexual assault of a client. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings of a hearing board, but modified the board’s recommendation of a ninety-day suspension to a suspension for six months. The respondent excepted to the panel’s recommendation on the ground that a six-month suspension was too severe and was punitive in nature. After considering the seriousness of the offense of which the respondent was convicted and the nature of the professional misconduct, however, we order…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. PozoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. AbelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Deutschendorf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. People v. MarmonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. In Re EgbuneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. BrailsfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API