Pacific States Fire Ins. v. C. Rowan Motor Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J.-
Plaintiff asserts that defendant forfeited the protection of its policy of insurance by knowingly misrepresenting certain material facts set out above, the first ground of attack upon the policy involving “other insurance” on the automobiles, and the defendant’s knowledge thereof.
While there are decisions to the contrary, it is a rule of law, generally accepted because of its reasonableness, that a policy of fire insurance will not be forfeited where other insurance exists without the knowledge or consent of the assured: 26 C. J., p. 188. Among the many cases supporting this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rowley v. . the Empire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
- California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Insurance Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fagg v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Fenter v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Floeck v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.