Vidrine v. United States
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
TRIAL RULING
DOHERTY, District Judge.
I. Background
This matter involves claims brought by plaintiffs, Hubert P. Vidrine, Jr. and Tammy J. Vidrine, against defendant, the United States of America, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. Hubert Vidrine asserts a claim for malicious prosecution; his wife, Tammy Vidrine, asserts a claim for loss of consortium.1 The claims are based on the actions of investigative and law enforcement officers of the U.S. Government, acting in the scope of their employment. Trial of this matter was to the bench, commencing on June…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Jordan v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Bernard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trinity Marine Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Smith v. City Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Barra v. BoudreauxDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Cerdes v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
- Chelette v. ZacharyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.