Legal Opinion
Bernard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 25, 1994No. 1281, Docket 93-6283PublishedCited by 401 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States and a number of federal employees in this action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). He alleged he was wrongly arrested as being a seller of crack cocaine. Since the district court correctly held there was no substantial issue of fact as to whether the defendants were justified in arresting and charging Bernard, we affirm the summary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by401 opinions
- Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Mark Giannullo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Savino v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Sylvia Panetta v. Thomas M. Crowley, Marc Jurnove, Patricia A. Kelvasa, John Doe I, Docket No. 02-7275-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.