Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Foothill Nissan

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1994No. B070925PublishedCited by 19 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.—

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs, Nelson L. Robbins and Sharon E. Robbins, appeal from an order dismissing their complaint against defendants, Foothill Nissan and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as receiver for Far Western Bank (Far Western) and Atlantic Finance Bank (Atlantic), a division of Far Western, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the published portion of this opinion, we determine that federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over suits which are filed prior to the appointment of the FDIC as the receiver against a banking or…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Saffer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Tearlach Resources Ltd. v. Western States International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Bank of Am. v. MachoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API