Legal Opinion

MacE Industries, Inc. v. Paddock Pool Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 21, 1986No. 0613PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This appeal involves a claim by respondent, Mace Industries, Inc. d/b/a Semblex Custom Equipment Assemblers and Ozark Industrial Air Company (Mace) against appellant Paddock Pool Equipment Company, Inc. (Paddock) for the balance of the purchase price of certain water treatment equipment, and for collection costs. Paddock counterclaimed to Mace’s complaint alleging that since Mace had given notice of its intent to dishonor all implied warranties, Paddock was entitled to a judicial declaration of what warranties covered the equipment. The trial judge found Mace entitled to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leonard Pevar Co. v. Evans Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  2. Sossamon v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Midland Guardian Co. v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westech Engineering, Inc. v. Clearwater Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Comark Merchandising, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Highland Group, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Weisz Graphics Division of the Fred B. Johnson Co. v. Peck Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Columbia Hyundai, Inc. v. CARLL HYUNDIA, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Laidlaw Environmental Servs., (TOC), Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API