Columbia Hyundai, Inc. v. CARLL HYUNDIA, INC.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Justice:
This is a contract case. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial judge properly submitted the issue of the existence of a contract to the jury. We find that he did and, accordingly, affirm.
FACTS
In early 1993, appellant, Columbia Hyundai, Inc. (Gibbes), 1 negotiated with respondent, Carll Hyundai (Carll) to purchase Carll’s Hyundai automobile dealership. After several months of negotiations between the parties and their attorneys, and numerous revisions to drafts of a proposed contract, Carll submitted an “Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets” to Gibbes on July 20,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc., a New York Corporation v. The Jordan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Player v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sonic Development Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1982
- Cook v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Weisz Graphics Division of the Fred B. Johnson Co. v. Peck Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prestwick Golf Club, Inc. v. Prestwick Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Calhoun v. Cullum's Lumber Mill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Essential Housing v. Landev InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999