Duluth Steam Cooperative Ass'n v. Ringsred
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant contends the district court erred in granting summary judgment for respondent on his claim for damages arising out of an underground explosion and steam leak. Appellant’s claim against respondent tortfea-sor is distinct from other claims he subrogat-ed to his casualty insurer. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
Respondent Duluth Steam Cooperative Association (Co-op) owns and maintains a system of steam pipes beneath the streets of downtown Duluth. Appellant Eric Ringsred owns property along Superior Street in Duluth. On May 31, 1985, a steam explosion occurred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Harford v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Bruwelheide v. GarveyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by10 opinions
- ADT Security Services, Inc. v. SwensonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Smith v. American States Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Schmuckler v. CreurerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Tezak v. BachkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.